EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Leadership Decision

By:   •  Essay  •  635 Words  •  November 8, 2009  •  1,128 Views

Page 1 of 3

Essay title: Leadership Decision

In the summer of 1941, as relations between the United States and Japan were rapidly deteriorating, Admiral Kimmel, commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet, received many warnings concerning the imminence of war. During this period, he worked out a plan in collaboration with his staff at Pearl Harbor, which gave priority to training key personnel and supplying basic equipment to U.S. outposts in the Far East. The plan took account of the possibility of a long, hard war with Japan and the difficulties of mobilizing scarce resources in manpower and material. At the time, Admiral Kimmel and his staff were keenly aware of the risks of being unprepared for war with Japan, as well s the high costs and risks involved in preparing for war. They appear to have been relatively optimistic about being able to develop a satisfactory military plan and about having sufficient time in which to implement it. In short, all the conditions were present for vigilance, and it seems likely that this coping pattern characterized their planning activity.

But during the fall of 1941, as warnings became increasingly more ominous, a different pattern of coping behavior emerged. Admiral Kimmel and his staff continued to cling to the policy to which they had committed themselves, discounting each fresh warning and failing to note that more and more signs were pointing to Pearl Harbor as a possible target for a surprise air attack. They repeatedly renewed their decision to continue using the available resources primarily for training green soldiers and sailors for supplying bases close to Japan, rather than instituting an adequate alert that would give priority to defending Pearl harbor against enemy attack.

Knowing that neither their own sector nor the rest of the U.S. military organization was ready for a shooting war, they clung to an unwarranted set of rationalizations. The Japanese, they thought, would not launch an attack against any American possession; and if by some remote change they decided to do so, it certainly wouldn't be Pearl Harbor. Admiral Kimmel and his staff acknowledged that Japan could launch a surprise attack in any direction, but remained convinced that it would not be launched in their direction. They saw no reason to change their course. Therefore, they continued to give peacetime weekend leave to the majority of the naval forces in Hawaii

Continue for 2 more pages »  •  Join now to read essay Leadership Decision and other term papers or research documents
Download as (for upgraded members)
txt
pdf
Citation Generator

(2009, 11). Leadership Decision. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 11, 2009, from https://www.essaysforstudent.com/essays/Leadership-Decision/1964.html

"Leadership Decision" EssaysForStudent.com. 11 2009. 2009. 11 2009 <https://www.essaysforstudent.com/essays/Leadership-Decision/1964.html>.

"Leadership Decision." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 11 2009. Web. 11 2009. <https://www.essaysforstudent.com/essays/Leadership-Decision/1964.html>.

"Leadership Decision." EssaysForStudent.com. 11, 2009. Accessed 11, 2009. https://www.essaysforstudent.com/essays/Leadership-Decision/1964.html.