EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Alternative Fuel Vehicles Comparison

By:   •  Essay  •  743 Words  •  June 3, 2010  •  1,224 Views

Page 1 of 3

Alternative Fuel Vehicles Comparison

Alternative Fuel Vehicles comparison

Electric

Early automobiles were electric, having electric motors powered by batteries. But their range was limited, and internal combustion engines were more powerful, at a time when there were not concerns about the supply of fuel, or the emissions. But, the recent focus on air quality and the advances in the battery technology have made the electric vehicle a viable alternative.

Electric drive systems are virtually pollution free, (in fact, they are the only vehicles to meet California’s Zero Emission Vehicle requirement), and extremely energy efficient. Only 20% of the energy in an internal combustion engine gets converted into useful work at the wheels, while 75% + of the energy from a battery reaches the wheels. They are also able to provide power at almost any engine speed, unlike internal combustion engines that have to be revved to a higher RPM to achieve maximum power. Electric engines provide near peak power even at low speeds, giving them strong acceleration from a stop.

But, there are some downsides. Public recharging sites are still not widely available, and the home recharging stations, while available, can be prohibitively expensive. Also, while the vehicles themselves are emission free, the production of electricity in general does produce emissions, causing electric vehicles to have an indirect impact on the environment.

Natural Gas

Natural gas as a vehicle fuel is already a time tested success. There are over 130,000 natural gas vehicles on the road in the US, and over 2 million worldwide. Existing vehicles can be converted to natural gas, or there are some models that were designed to use natural gas. In some cases, the vehicle can be converted to a bi-fuel system. A bi-fuel vehicle has two separate fuel systems, one for gas or diesel, and the other for compressed natural gas. Natural gas is a domestic resource that will help the US reduce its dependence on foreign oil. And while it does emit more total hydrocarbons, it has lower emissions of carbon monoxide, non-methane hydrocarbon and NO x. In addition, natural gas vehicles do not emit the particulate matter that creates the smog like haze and that causes harm to respiratory and cardio vascular systems. But, natural gas vehicles cannot be refueled by pumping fuel into the fuel tank. The fuel is compressed into tanks, taking up more space, and increasing the cost of the vehicle.

Hydrogen

Hydrogen is one of the simplest fuels, used to power combustion engines and fuel cells (see Fuel Cell, below). Designing the hydrogen powered vehicles and building the necessary fueling infrastructure is in the early demonstration phases. But, the US government

Continue for 2 more pages »  •  Join now to read essay Alternative Fuel Vehicles Comparison
Download as (for upgraded members)
txt
pdf